From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125FCE01304 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:49:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Jun 2012 09:49:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="116605757" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.120.185]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Jun 2012 09:49:14 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Jack Mitchell Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:49:12 +0100 Message-ID: <1849604.yJORxvhzRh@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.2.0-25-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.3; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4FEB378C.9050307@communistcode.co.uk> References: <20317992.tBZ1YY1I5v@helios> <4427881.ZDyEgbkgV4@helios> <4FEB378C.9050307@communistcode.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: LAMP layer X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:49:24 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 27 June 2012 17:40:44 Jack Mitchell wrote: > I do agree that layers within layers is a bit confusing, however the > earlier proposed meta-networking included having some of the > applications in this proposed layer too. If this was instead, then it's > fine, but if it's as well then it could get confusing. It's something I've been discussing with Joe MacDonald already. I think it's an either-or situation - the recipes will not need to be in both layers. People who want recipes from either or both layers should be able to include the layers as needed. > A possible compromise could be a git sub-module for meta-lamp inside > meta-networking, or at least a file containing the meta-lamp location > and highlighting its availability? Given the above I think a pointer in the meta-networking README towards the web server layer would be reasonable. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre