From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: fix level of scan debug log on BSD Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 17:36:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1852586.cdvAFzMDef@xps> References: <20170711171046.22558-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20170803101622.GA42296@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Bruce Richardson Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C576F324B for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 17:36:43 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20170803101622.GA42296@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 03/08/2017 12:16, Bruce Richardson: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 07:10:46PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Printing the number of scanned devices should be a debug log, > > not an error. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > --- [...] > > - RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "PCI scan found %u devices\n", dev_count); > > + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "PCI scan found %u devices\n", dev_count); > > return 0; > > > would have gone for INFO level myself, but DEBUG works too - it's > definitely not an error. > The commit title also reads a bit strange to me. How about e.g.: > "pci: log fix level of PCI scan summary message on BSD" > > Otherwise: > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson Applied, thanks