From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sujith Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:02:48 +0530 Subject: [ath9k-devel] Atheros Throughput with Aggregation & Encryption In-Reply-To: <488F7ADA.2090505@solectek.com> References: <1490851897-1217291691-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-512143513-@bxe135.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <488E653F.5060008@solectek.com> <20080729031028.GH6962@tesla> <488F5632.20204@solectek.com> <488F7ADA.2090505@solectek.com> Message-ID: <18575.50368.515680.769554@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Mahesh Kumar wrote: > I am using the latest Fusion Driver from Atheros. I compared the code > with ath9k, and it's pretty much the same, than using different naming > convention. So I assume the problem should be there with latest ath9k > also, when we enable the Aggregation (AMPDU) and Encryption together. It > would be great if somebody already did the same/similar test with ath9k, > share the result. > > Regarding the fusion driver, > > It's not yet integrated to the kernel 2.6.13. It's built as modules. The Fusion driver was written for the net80211 stack and is a completely different beast from ath9k. Please don't post issues that you find in Fusion in ath9k-devel. Sujith -- http://sujith-m.blogspot.com