From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Jeremie Galarneau <jgalar@efficios.com>,
lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>,
openembedded-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lttng-modules: Backport patches to fix compilation failures since kernel v5.1
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 06:58:22 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1859381600.42862.1560337102909.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190612105114.GA23143@localhost>
----- On Jun 12, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Adrian Bunk bunk@stusta.de wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:49:34PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 17:03 +0800, zhe.he@windriver.com wrote:
>> > From: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
>> >
>> > For the moment,
>> > 0001~0004 are on master branch only.
>> > 0005~0007 are on stable-2.11 branch, but v2.11 has not been released
>> > yet.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
>> > ---
>> > v2: Correct a typo in SOB for 0001*.patch
>>
>> I just discussed this with lttng upstream maintainers a little. We're
>> going to have continual tension between keeping lttng-modules up to
>> date and new kernel versions.
>>
>> How about we also have a git version of this particular recipe which
>> has a DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" but people can opt into with a
>> PREFERRED_VERSION when using newer kernels?
>
> Yocto stable series will ship a _git AUTOREV recipe?
>
>> That should keep people using very recent kernels happy, let us use a
>> stable release version and avoid us adding/removing large patchsets on
>> a semi regular basis?
>>...
>
> The semi regular basis is only slightly moved, or how and when will
> replacing the already EOL kernel 5.0 with 5.1 in Yocto be handled?
>
> IMHO it would be better to acknowledge that this is a case where staying
> at stable release versions is sometimes not the best option, and upgrade
> the normal recipe to -rc releases or even a git snapshot from a more
> recent stable branch when necessary.
>
> E.g. right now it seems clear that the next Yocto release will have
> to use lttng-modules >= 2.11 in any case for kernel 5.2, so upgrading
> from 2.10.9 to 2.11.0-rc5 would be logical.
Please don't base distributions on -rc tags. They are not meant for this.
We always integrate support for newer kernel versions instrumentation back
into our current stable release. So as soon as 5.2 final comes out, we will
release a 2.10.x version including support for it in lttng-modules.
The current 2.10.10 has commits to support the currently known 5.2-rc
instrumentation changes.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Richard
>
> cu
> Adrian
>
> --
>
> "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
> of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
> "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
> Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-12 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-11 9:03 [PATCH v2] lttng-modules: Backport patches to fix compilation failures since kernel v5.1 zhe.he
2019-06-11 22:49 ` Richard Purdie
2019-06-11 22:57 ` Bruce Ashfield
2019-06-25 7:59 ` He Zhe
2019-06-25 8:04 ` richard.purdie
2019-06-25 9:49 ` He Zhe
2019-06-12 9:14 ` He Zhe
2019-06-12 10:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2019-06-12 10:58 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
[not found] ` <1859381600.42862.1560337102909.JavaMail.zimbra-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2019-06-12 11:10 ` He Zhe
2019-06-12 11:10 ` He Zhe
2019-06-12 11:29 ` [OE-core] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-06-12 11:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <928433718.42889.1560338990358.JavaMail.zimbra-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2019-06-12 12:32 ` He Zhe
2019-06-12 12:32 ` He Zhe
[not found] ` <0ea3a599-7adb-a001-dbdd-3843d0fa8b6e-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2019-06-12 14:52 ` Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
2019-06-12 14:52 ` Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
2019-06-12 14:56 ` Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
2019-06-12 14:56 ` Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
2019-06-14 2:33 ` He Zhe
2019-06-14 2:33 ` He Zhe
2019-06-12 13:27 ` Adrian Bunk
2019-06-12 13:27 ` Adrian Bunk
2019-06-12 13:33 ` [OE-core] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-06-12 13:33 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-06-12 10:58 ` [OE-core] " Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1859381600.42862.1560337102909.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=jgalar@efficios.com \
--cc=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.