From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sander Eikelenboom Subject: Re: [qemu-upstream-unstable test] 22066: regressions - FAIL Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 00:50:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1863264167.20131123005018@eikelenboom.it> References: <78581103.20131121183647@eikelenboom.it> <1385055875.6071.194.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1385055875.6071.194.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Anthony PERARD , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "xen.org" , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Thursday, November 21, 2013, 6:44:35 PM, you wrote: > On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 18:36 +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >> Thursday, November 21, 2013, 5:37:57 PM, you wrote: >> >> > flight 22066 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real] >> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22066/ >> >> > Regressions :-( >> >> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, >> > including tests which could not be run: >> > test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 20054 >> >> Wasn't this supposed to be fixed by Anthony Perards fix for Xen ? > Yes, but that needs to pass regression testing on the xen-unstable > branch before the qemu branch will be tested against it. xen-unstable is > currently not going through for unrelated reasons but I expect it will > unwedge tonight. > Ian. Hi Ian / Stefano, Is the tree and branch being tested here published somewhere ? A commit of mine is in there, but i can't find it where i would expected in: git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-upstream-unstable.git (and also not in: git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-upstream-unstable.git nor git://git.qemu.org/qemu.git) But it is mentioned in the "People who touched revisions under test" ... -- Sander