From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RTVw1-0000u8-5k for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:49:37 +0100 Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2011 01:43:03 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,563,1315206000"; d="scan'208";a="40810330" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.185]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2011 01:43:02 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:43:01 +0000 Message-ID: <1864854.crejHBLR9b@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.7.3 (Linux/3.0.0-13-generic-pae; KDE/4.7.3; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [meta-handheld][PATCH 5/5] linux: remove unused git version X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:49:37 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Thursday 24 November 2011 10:24:44 Martin Jansa wrote: > Are you going to refresh and refactor something or is this patchset > fine if Paul applies only first 3? Because your 3.1.2 patch says it > should be applied on top of this.. > > If you or Paul want I can send pull request with first 3 from this + > 3.1.2 and my changes to linux-kexecboot.inc + 3.2.0-rc3, because I > have it all in jansa/spitz anyway. We discovered last night that we can't move hx4700 to 3.1 because the necessary patches don't apply. However as of this morning I do now have patches against 3.2.0-rc2 (hopefully they also apply against rc3). My suggestion would be to produce a new set of patches that only affects the Zaurus machines and we can handle the iPAQs separately. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre