From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Matt W. Benjamin" Subject: Re: KeyFileStore ? Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:56:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1866818785.20.1406814992606.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from aa.linuxbox.com ([69.128.83.226]:4189 "EHLO aa.linuxbox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751710AbaGaN4k (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:56:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org +1 ----- "Sage Weil" wrote: > > Anyway, at the end of the day, small writes or overwrites would still > be > journaled, but large writes or large new objects would not, which > would (I > think) be a pretty big improvement. Yes. Overall, I think the design will > be > much simpler to reason about, and there are several potential avenues > to > be clever and make improvements. I'm not sure we can say the same > about > the FileStore design, which suffers from the fact that it has evolved > > slowly over the last 9 years or so. > -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309