From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Hao Yao <hao.yao@intel.com>,
Dan Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>,
djrscally@gmail.com, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@intel.com>
Cc: Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: int3472: Add handshake GPIO function
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:22:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <186830d2-dd18-7948-b2c5-bcda934ad3e8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231007021225.9240-1-hao.yao@intel.com>
Hi,
On 10/7/23 04:12, Hao Yao wrote:
> Handshake pin is used for Lattice MIPI aggregator to enable the
> camera sensor. After pulled up, recommend to wail ~250ms to get
> everything ready.
If this is a pin on the "Lattice MIPI aggregator" and
not on the sensor itself then this really should be
modeled as such and should not be registered as a GPIO
consumed by the sensor since the actual sensor does not
have a handshake pin at all.
Also we really don't want to need to patch all involved
sensor drivers to toggle a handshake pin, especially since
the sensor itself does not physically have this pin.
Can you explain a bit more:
1. What the "Lattice MIPI aggregator" is
2. What its functions are, does this control reset + pwdn
GPIOs for the sensor? Voltages to the sensor? Clk
to the sensor ?
3. How the aggregator is connected to both the main
CPU/SoC as well as how it is connected to the sensor ?
Some example diagram would be really helpful here.
Then with this info in hand we can try to come up
with a way how to model this.
Assuming this controls the entire power-up sequence
for the sensor then I think it could be modelled
as a GPIO regulator. This also allows making the
regulator core take care of the necessary delay
between setting the GPIO and trying to talk to
the sensor.
Regards,
Hans
>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Yao <hao.yao@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/common.h | 1 +
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/common.h b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/common.h
> index 655ae3ec0593..3ad4c72afb45 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/common.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/common.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> #define INT3472_GPIO_TYPE_POWER_ENABLE 0x0b
> #define INT3472_GPIO_TYPE_CLK_ENABLE 0x0c
> #define INT3472_GPIO_TYPE_PRIVACY_LED 0x0d
> +#define INT3472_GPIO_TYPE_HANDSHAKE 0x12
>
> #define INT3472_PDEV_MAX_NAME_LEN 23
> #define INT3472_MAX_SENSOR_GPIOS 3
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c
> index b644ce65c990..4753161b4080 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c
> @@ -111,6 +111,10 @@ static void int3472_get_func_and_polarity(u8 type, const char **func, u32 *polar
> *func = "power-enable";
> *polarity = GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH;
> break;
> + case INT3472_GPIO_TYPE_HANDSHAKE:
> + *func = "handshake";
> + *polarity = GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH;
> + break;
> default:
> *func = "unknown";
> *polarity = GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH;
> @@ -201,6 +205,7 @@ static int skl_int3472_handle_gpio_resources(struct acpi_resource *ares,
> switch (type) {
> case INT3472_GPIO_TYPE_RESET:
> case INT3472_GPIO_TYPE_POWERDOWN:
> + case INT3472_GPIO_TYPE_HANDSHAKE:
> ret = skl_int3472_map_gpio_to_sensor(int3472, agpio, func, polarity);
> if (ret)
> err_msg = "Failed to map GPIO pin to sensor\n";
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-12 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-07 2:12 [PATCH] platform/x86: int3472: Add handshake GPIO function Hao Yao
2023-10-10 7:17 ` Bingbu Cao
2023-10-10 7:53 ` Hao Yao
2023-10-12 12:22 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2023-11-27 7:31 ` Hao Yao
2024-03-31 10:51 ` Anthony I Gilea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=186830d2-dd18-7948-b2c5-bcda934ad3e8@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
--cc=dan.scally@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=hao.yao@intel.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.