Re: [PATCH] librte_pmd_fm10k: Fix max_vfs issue in fm10k PMD

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>]

2015-05-12 05:30, Qiu, Michael:
> Hi, thomas
> 
> What about this patch?

It seems this patch was not *really* sent to dev@dpdk.org.
Please re-send, keeping the Acked-by line.

> On 4/16/2015 4:09 PM, Chen, Jing D wrote:
> > From: Michael Qiu [mailto:qiudayu@cn.ibm.com]
> >> From: Michael Qiu <michael.qiu@intel.com>
> >>
> >> In DPDK, max_vfs means vf numbers created, not the max number vfs
> >> the device supported.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Qiu <michael.qiu@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
> >> b/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
> >> index 0312fad..297ff88 100644
> >> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
> >> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
> >> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ fm10k_dev_infos_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >>  	dev_info->max_tx_queues      = hw->mac.max_queues;
> >>  	dev_info->max_mac_addrs      = 1;
> >>  	dev_info->max_hash_mac_addrs = 0;
> >> -	dev_info->max_vfs            = FM10K_MAX_VF_NUM;
> >> +	dev_info->max_vfs            = dev->pci_dev->max_vfs;
> >>  	dev_info->max_vmdq_pools     = ETH_64_POOLS;
> >>  	dev_info->rx_offload_capa =
> >>  		DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
> >> --
> >> 1.9.3
> > Acked-by Jing Chen <jing.d.chen@intel.com>