All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Misbah khan <misbah_khan@engineer.com>
To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: floating point support in the driver.
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 05:00:09 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18772952.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200808011332.25368.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com>


I am not very clear Why floating point support in the Kernel should be
avoided ?

We want our DSP algorithm to run at the boot time and since kernel thread
having higher priority , i assume that it would be faster than user
application.

If i really have to speed up my application execution what mechanism will
you suggest me to try ?

After using Hardware VFP support also i am still laging the timing
requirement by 800 ms in my case 

---- Misbah <><


Laurent Pinchart-4 wrote:
> 
> On Friday 01 August 2008, Misbah khan wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I have a DSP algorithm which i am running in the application even after
>> enabling the VFP support it is taking a lot of time to get executed hence 
>> 
>> I want to transform the same into the driver insted of an user
>> application.
>> Can anybody suggest whether doing the same could be a better solution and
>> what could be the chalenges that i have to face by implimenting such
>> floating point support in the driver.
>> 
>> Is there a way in the application itself to make it execute faster.
> 
> Floating-point in the kernel should be avoided. FPU state save/restore
> operations are costly and are not performed by the kernel when switching
> from userspace to kernelspace context. You will have to protect
> floating-point sections with kernel_fpu_begin/kernel_fpu_end which, if I'm
> not mistaken, disables preemption. That's probably not something you want
> to do. Why would the same code run faster in kernelspace then userspace ?
> 
> -- 
> Laurent Pinchart
> CSE Semaphore Belgium
> 
> Chaussee de Bruxelles, 732A
> B-1410 Waterloo
> Belgium
> 
> T +32 (2) 387 42 59
> F +32 (2) 387 42 75
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/floating-point-support-in-the-driver.-tp18772109p18772952.html
Sent from the linuxppc-embedded mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-01 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-01 10:57 floating point support in the driver Misbah khan
2008-08-01 11:32 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-08-01 12:00   ` Misbah khan [this message]
2008-08-01 15:54     ` M. Warner Losh
2008-08-04  5:23       ` Misbah khan
2008-08-04  5:33         ` M. Warner Losh
2008-08-04  5:47           ` David Hawkins
2008-08-05  9:49             ` Misbah khan
2008-08-05 16:53               ` David Hawkins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18772952.post@talk.nabble.com \
    --to=misbah_khan@engineer.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.