From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>, hari@in.ibm.com
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Subject: Re: BUG_ON(!cpus_equal(cpumask, tmp));
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:22:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <187940000.1080692555@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040330151729.1bd0c5d0.rddunlap@osdl.org>
>| We faced this problem starting 2.6.3 while working on kexec.
>|
>| The problem is because we now initialize cpu_vm_mask for init_mm with
>| CPU_MASK_ALL (from 2.6.3 onwards) which makes all bits in cpumask 1 (on SMP).
>| Hence BUG_ON(!cpus_equal(cpumask,tmp) fails. The change to set
>| cpu_vm_mask to CPU_MASK_ALL was done to remove tlb flush optimizations
>| for ppc64.
>|
>| I had posted a patch for this in the earlier thread. Reposting the same
>| here. This patch removes the assertion and uses "tmp" instead of cpumask.
>| Otherwise, we will end up sending IPIs to offline CPUs as well.
>|
>| Comments please.
>
> I'll just say that kexec fails without this patch and works with
> it applied, so I'd like to see it merged. If this patch isn't
> acceptable, let's find out why and try to make one that is.
>
> Thanks for the patch, Hari.
>From discussions with Andy, it seems this still has the same race as before
just smaller. I don't see how we can fix this properly without having some
locking on cpu_online_map .... probably RCU as it's massively read-biased
and we don't want to pay a spinlock cost to read it.
M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-31 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-29 15:39 BUG_ON(!cpus_equal(cpumask, tmp)); Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-30 0:21 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-30 0:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-30 13:28 ` Hariprasad Nellitheertha
2004-03-30 23:17 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-03-31 0:22 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2004-03-31 0:39 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-31 0:57 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-31 1:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-31 1:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-31 1:36 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-31 1:51 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-31 4:43 ` Hariprasad Nellitheertha
2004-04-01 0:31 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-04-01 5:04 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2004-04-01 11:38 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-04-02 18:33 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-01 8:42 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-01 13:57 ` Hariprasad Nellitheertha
2004-04-03 1:45 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-03-31 1:01 ` Andy Whitcroft
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-02 23:51 Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=187940000.1080692555@flay \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=hari@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.