All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com>, asmadeus@codewreck.org
Cc: ericvh@kernel.org, lucho@ionkov.net, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	mhiramat@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9p: prevent read overrun in protocol dump tracepoint
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2023 14:05:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1881630.VfuOzHrogK@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZWq0BvPGYMTi-WfC@codewreck.org>

On Saturday, December 2, 2023 5:35:18 AM CET asmadeus@codewreck.org wrote:
> JP Kobryn wrote on Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 07:04:10PM -0800:
> > An out of bounds read can occur within the tracepoint 9p_protocol_dump().
> > In the fast assign, there is a memcpy that uses a constant size of 32
> > (macro definition as P9_PROTO_DUMP_SZ). When the copy is invoked, the
> > source buffer is not guaranteed match this size. It was found that in some
> > cases the source buffer size is less than 32, resulting in a read that
> > overruns.
> > 
> > The size of the source buffer seems to be known at the time of the
> > tracepoint being invoked. The allocations happen within p9_fcall_init(),
> > where the capacity field is set to the allocated size of the payload
> > buffer. This patch tries to fix the overrun by using the minimum of that
> > field (size of source buffer) and the size of destination buffer when
> > performing the copy.
> 
> Good catch; this is a regression due to a semi-recent optimization in
> commit 60ece0833b6c ("net/9p: allocate appropriate reduced message
> buffers")

Indeed, didn't have this one on screen! Thanks!

> For some reason I thought we rounded up small messages alloc to 4k but
> I've just confirmed we don't, so these overruns are quite frequent.
> I'll add the fixes tag and cc to stable if there's no other comment.

Yeah, in p9_msg_buf_size() [net/9p/protocol.c] the smallest allocation size
for message types known to be small (at compile-time) is hard coded to 4k.

However for all variable-size message types the size is calculated at runtime
exactly as needed for that particular message being sent. So these 9p message
types can trigger this case (<32). They are currently never rounded up.

[...]
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/9p.h b/include/trace/events/9p.h
> > index 4dfa6d7f83ba..8690a7086252 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/events/9p.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/9p.h
> > @@ -185,7 +185,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(9p_protocol_dump,
> >  		    __entry->clnt   =  clnt;
> >  		    __entry->type   =  pdu->id;
> >  		    __entry->tag    =  pdu->tag;
> > -		    memcpy(__entry->line, pdu->sdata, P9_PROTO_DUMP_SZ);
> > +		    memcpy(__entry->line, pdu->sdata,
> > +				min(pdu->capacity, P9_PROTO_DUMP_SZ));
> >  		    ),
> >  	    TP_printk("clnt %lu %s(tag = %d)\n%.3x: %16ph\n%.3x: %16ph\n",
> >  		      (unsigned long)__entry->clnt, show_9p_op(__entry->type),

AFAICS __entry is a local variable on stack, and array __entry->line not
intialized with zeros, i.e. the dump would contain trash at the end. Maybe
prepending memset() before memcpy()?

/Christian



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-02 13:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-02  3:04 [PATCH] 9p: prevent read overrun in protocol dump tracepoint JP Kobryn
2023-12-02  4:35 ` asmadeus
2023-12-02  7:19   ` asmadeus
2023-12-02 13:05   ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2023-12-03  1:14     ` Steven Rostedt
2023-12-03  1:33       ` Dominique Martinet
2023-12-03  4:15         ` Steven Rostedt
2023-12-03  5:32           ` Dominique Martinet
2023-12-04 16:20             ` JP Kobryn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1881630.VfuOzHrogK@silver \
    --to=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
    --cc=inwardvessel@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.