From: John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, kbusch@kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] block: scan partitions for hidden disks
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:43:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <188916f8-45e2-434c-a466-376854c7fa4c@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260819091350.GA10298@lst.de>
On 8/19/26 10:13, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 10:12:50AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
>>> It also is used for giving a handle to NVMe devices that we can't support
>>> as block devices and for which we only want a handle to issue passthrough
>>> commands. For those attempting a partition scan is rather suboptimal.
>>
>> We could set GENHD_FL_NO_PART in that case (as well as the hidden flag).
>
> I guess we could do that. It still feels wrong, though :
Maybe we just don't change the GENHD_FL_HIDDEN behavior. As long as
/proc/diskstats and /proc/partitions don't show those per-path partitions.
It seems to me that we need to have a dedicated function to clone the
partitions, and it would be called per NS after nvme_mpath_set_live() ->
device_add_disk(). I am not sure if that works, though. We may get
nvme_ns_head_submit_bio() looking up the per-path partition before they
are available. In that case I would need to keep the path disabled until
after the partition table is available.
>
>>> As is in general doing an extra scan per controller when we know it must
>>> give the same results. Wouldn't it make more sense to just propagate
>>> the partition table from the ns_head to each individual path?
>>
>> So you mean that we would have something which can clone the head gendisk
>> partitions onto the per-path gendisk by itering >part_tbl and calling
>> something like blk_add_partition(), right?
>
> Yes.
ok
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-19 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 12:08 [PATCH RFC v2 0/2] fix NVMe multipath partition diskstats John Garry
2026-08-18 12:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] block: scan partitions for hidden disks John Garry
2026-08-19 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-19 9:12 ` John Garry
2026-08-19 9:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-19 9:43 ` John Garry [this message]
2026-08-18 12:08 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/2] nvme-multipath: fix diskstats for partitions John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=188916f8-45e2-434c-a466-376854c7fa4c@linux.dev \
--to=john.garry@linux.dev \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.