All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Q: selinux_bprm_committed_creds() && signals/do_wait
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:42:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19024.1241008933@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090429115550.GA25368@redhat.com>

Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:

> No need to check ->shared_pending + ->pending. We can't have SIGKILL
> (shared or not) without SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT.

Okay, I didn't realise we did this now.

How about the attached patch then?

David
---
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] SELinux: Don't flush inherited SIGKILL during execve()

Don't flush inherited SIGKILL during execve() in SELinux's post cred commit
hook.  This isn't really a security problem: if the SIGKILL came before the
credentials were changed, then we were right to receive it at the time, and
should honour it; if it came after the creds were changed, then we definitely
should honour it; and in any case, all that will happen is that the process
will be scrapped before it ever returns to userspace.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---

 include/linux/sched.h    |    1 +
 kernel/signal.c          |   11 ++++++++---
 security/selinux/hooks.c |   10 +++++-----
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)


diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index b4c38bc..3fa82b3 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1885,6 +1885,7 @@ extern void sched_dead(struct task_struct *p);
 
 extern void proc_caches_init(void);
 extern void flush_signals(struct task_struct *);
+extern void __flush_signals(struct task_struct *);
 extern void ignore_signals(struct task_struct *);
 extern void flush_signal_handlers(struct task_struct *, int force_default);
 extern int dequeue_signal(struct task_struct *tsk, sigset_t *mask, siginfo_t *info);
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index d803473..d2dd9cf 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -249,14 +249,19 @@ void flush_sigqueue(struct sigpending *queue)
 /*
  * Flush all pending signals for a task.
  */
+void __flush_signals(struct task_struct *t)
+{
+	clear_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_SIGPENDING);
+	flush_sigqueue(&t->pending);
+	flush_sigqueue(&t->signal->shared_pending);
+}
+
 void flush_signals(struct task_struct *t)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&t->sighand->siglock, flags);
-	clear_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_SIGPENDING);
-	flush_sigqueue(&t->pending);
-	flush_sigqueue(&t->signal->shared_pending);
+	__flush_signals(t);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&t->sighand->siglock, flags);
 }
 
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 02c2647..76670e2 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -2378,7 +2378,6 @@ static void selinux_bprm_committed_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	struct sighand_struct *psig;
 	u32 osid, sid;
 	int rc, i;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	osid = tsec->osid;
 	sid = tsec->sid;
@@ -2398,11 +2397,12 @@ static void selinux_bprm_committed_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 		memset(&itimer, 0, sizeof itimer);
 		for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
 			do_setitimer(i, &itimer, NULL);
-		flush_signals(current);
 		spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-		flush_signal_handlers(current, 1);
-		sigemptyset(&current->blocked);
-		recalc_sigpending();
+		if (!(current->signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT)) {
+			__flush_signals(current);
+			flush_signal_handlers(current, 1);
+			sigemptyset(&current->blocked);
+		}
 		spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 	}
 


  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-29 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-28 22:30 Q: selinux_bprm_committed_creds() && signals/do_wait Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-28 23:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-29 16:01   ` [PATCH] do_wait: do take security_task_wait() into account Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-30 20:31     ` Roland McGrath
2009-04-30 22:51     ` James Morris
2009-05-06 11:46       ` Stephen Smalley
2009-04-29  0:29 ` Q: selinux_bprm_committed_creds() && signals/do_wait James Morris
2009-04-29  6:58   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-29 10:02     ` David Howells
2009-04-29 10:25       ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-29 11:17         ` David Howells
2009-04-29 11:55           ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-29 12:42             ` David Howells [this message]
2009-04-29 12:45               ` David Howells
2009-04-29 13:28                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-30  0:37                   ` James Morris
2009-04-29 12:20     ` Stephen Smalley
2009-04-29 12:56       ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-29 13:16         ` Stephen Smalley
2009-04-29 13:42           ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-29 13:43             ` Stephen Smalley
2009-04-29 14:47           ` Alan Cox
2009-04-29 15:39             ` Stephen Smalley
2009-04-29 13:18 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-04-29 13:30   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-29 14:02   ` ptrace: selinux_bprm_committed_creds: simplify __wake_up_parent() code and s/parent/real_parent/ Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-29 14:08     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-30 22:44       ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-03 20:10         ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-04 17:38           ` Roland McGrath
2009-04-30  0:38     ` James Morris
2009-04-30 22:38     ` Roland McGrath
2009-04-29 14:48 ` Q: selinux_bprm_committed_creds() && signals/do_wait Alan Cox
2009-05-01  0:02 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-01  0:44   ` David Howells
2009-05-01  0:50     ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-03 20:21   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-04 17:34     ` Roland McGrath

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19024.1241008933@redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.