From: Marek Lindner <mareklindner@neomailbox.ch>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: introduce "noflood" broadcast flood prevention option
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 05:56:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1906609.VMlLDzDynG@rousseau> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190426171231.18156-1-linus.luessing@c0d3.blue>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1146 bytes --]
On Saturday, 27 April 2019 01:12:31 HKT Linus Lüssing wrote:
> With DAT DHCP snooping, the gateway feature and multicast optimizations
> in place in some scenarios broadcast flooding might not be strictly
> necessary anymore to be able to establish IPv4/IPv6 communication.
> Therefore this patch adds an option to disable broadcast flooding.
>
> Larger mesh networks typically filter a variety of multicast packets via
> ebtables/netfilter to clamp on overhead. With this option such firewall
> rules can be relaxed so that such multicast packets are only dropped
> if they cannot be handled by multicast-to-unicast, for instance.
Could you outline the use-case for this specific noflood option in more detail ?
The description above is not entirely clear to me. Especially, the 'might not
be strictly necessary anymore' to 'firewall rules can be relaxed'. How are
these things connected ? Is this option implemented only, so that some firewall
rules don't need to be set anymore ?
What happens if a user enables 'noflood' but does not fall into the 'might not
be strictly necessary anymore' category ?
Thanks,
Marek
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-26 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-26 17:12 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: introduce "noflood" broadcast flood prevention option Linus Lüssing
2019-04-26 21:56 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
2019-04-27 2:38 ` Linus Lüssing
2019-04-27 2:53 ` Linus Lüssing
2019-04-28 17:04 ` Sven Eckelmann
2019-04-28 19:04 ` Martin Weinelt
2019-04-30 16:01 ` Linus Lüssing
2019-04-30 16:07 ` Linus Lüssing
2019-05-02 6:40 ` Sven Eckelmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1906609.VMlLDzDynG@rousseau \
--to=mareklindner@neomailbox.ch \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.