From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: add back support for concurrent enqueue Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 14:46:27 +0100 Message-ID: <1912247.matrgae8HA@xps13> References: <1471291224-12755-1-git-send-email-rich.lane@bigswitch.com> <20160822141636.GC30752@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Huawei Xie , "Wang, Zhihong" To: Rich Lane , Yuanhan Liu Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED6F37B4 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:46:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n11so56454933wma.0 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 05:46:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-08-23 15:42, Rich Lane: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Yuanhan Liu > wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:27:06AM -0700, Rich Lane wrote: > > > I could also add back concurrent enqueue support for mergeable RX= , but I > > > was hoping to avoid that since the mergeable codepath is already = complex > > > and wouldn't be used in high performance deployments. > > > > Another note is that, you might also have noticed, Zhihong made a p= atch > > set [0] to optimize the enqueue code path (mainly on mergeable path= ). It > > basically does a rewrite from scatch, which removes the desc buf > > reservation, > > meaning it would be harder to do concurrent enqueue support based o= n that. > > > > [0]: Aug 19 Zhihong Wang ( 68) =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80>[PATCH v3 0/5= ] vhost: optimize > > enqueue >=20 > Yes, I'd noticed that these patches would conflict. Once the vhost-cu= se > removal and > Zhihong's patches have merged I'll send a new version. What is the status of this feature?