From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Spam <spam@tnonline.net>
Subject: Re: Kernel panic when using repacker with reverse order
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:22:53 +0200
Message-ID: <1915449341.20040920172253@tnonline.net>
References: <1986966896.20040918020309@tnonline.net>
 <20040918152442.GS5137@backtop.namesys.com>
 <7810725217.20040918174019@tnonline.net>
 <20040920072419.GU5137@backtop.namesys.com>
 <41090407.20040920164306@tnonline.net>
 <20040920145912.GX5137@backtop.namesys.com>
 <1464806513.20040920171422@tnonline.net>
Reply-To: Spam <spam@tnonline.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-21853-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <1464806513.20040920171422@tnonline.net>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Alex Zarochentsev <zam@namesys.com>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 04:43:06PM +0200, Spam wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> > On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 05:40:19PM +0200, Spam wrote:
>>> >> 
>>> >>   Debug options were not turned on. Shall I recompile the kernel with
>>> >>   these on?
>>> 
>>> > yes. it gives much more info usually.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> >>   I have upgraded to rc2-mm1. I will try the repacker again later
>>> >>   today and see if there is any change.
>>> 
>>>   I have run several attempts now with the repacker and have not yet
>>>   had a error. I am also using the 4k stack patch with this kernel.

>> does reiser4 work with 4k stack?

   Clarification: I used the parse-options-reduce-stack-usage.patch to
   enable reiser4 to work with 4k stacks.

>   Yes so far. I have run the repacker several times and I have written
>   and moved a few GB back and forth. No errors yet.

>   ~S