From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:38:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:38:31 -0400 Received: from ppp0.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.3]:20741 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:38:18 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: John Jasen cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kdb@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: strange network hangs using kdb In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 05 Jun 2001 12:20:25 -0400." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 02:38:08 +1000 Message-ID: <19199.991759088@ocs3.ocs-net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:20:25 -0400, John Jasen wrote: >On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Keith Owens wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:20:26 -0400, >> John Jasen wrote: >> >When we use kdb on one of the systems, the other system stops receiving >> >packets. >> >> man linux/Documentation/kdb/kdb.mm, section Interrupts and KDB. > >I would expect one system to fall off the network, when it is put into >kdb. However, why does it have any effect on the other system, which may >or may not be in kdb? It does not. kdb is intrusive when it trips but even it cannot reach across a network and stop another machine. Look for a networking problem on the other system.