All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
To: LC Bruzenak <lenny@magitekltd.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] audit: log join and part events to the read-only multicast log socket
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:08:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1919994.kBtqGod6UL@sifl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54490E85.6020403@magitekltd.com>

On Thursday, October 23, 2014 09:19:49 AM LC Bruzenak wrote:
> On 10/22/2014 04:29 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > Well, like I said, It's probably safer that way as the code will work
> > regardless.  Time to break bad habits :)
> 
> I hear you. But there's working and there's working well.
> As long as we don't suffer a search response degradation by changing the
> assumptive order, as I said, I'm OK with going back and reworking code.
> If it makes searching real data unusable, it's now broken some
> operational stuff.

Performance is a big deal, I think we've all been hearing that for some time 
now.  I get it, and it is something that is and will remain *a* priority.  
However, this fixed ordering is something that is Just Plain Wrong and is 
likely to make life much more difficult for us as we try to improve audit.

-- 
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-23 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-07 18:23 [RFC][PATCH] audit: log join and part events to the read-only multicast log socket Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-07 19:03 ` Eric Paris
2014-10-07 19:39   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-07 22:06     ` Paul Moore
2014-10-11 15:42       ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-11 20:00         ` Paul Moore
2014-10-21 16:41     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-21 19:56   ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-21 21:08     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-21 21:40       ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-29 20:23         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-21 22:30       ` Eric Paris
2014-10-21 23:14         ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22  1:18         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-22 14:30         ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-21 22:30     ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22  1:24       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-22 13:34         ` Paul Moore
2014-10-29 21:09           ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-22 14:34         ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 14:25       ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 14:30         ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 14:36           ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 15:08             ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 15:12         ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 15:51           ` LC Bruzenak
2014-10-22 16:24             ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 18:18             ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 19:36               ` LC Bruzenak
2014-10-22 20:00               ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 15:28         ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22 17:56           ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 20:06             ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22 20:34               ` LC Bruzenak
2014-10-22 20:44                 ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22 21:11                   ` LC Bruzenak
2014-10-22 21:29                     ` Paul Moore
2014-10-23 14:19                       ` LC Bruzenak
2014-10-23 19:08                         ` Paul Moore [this message]
2014-10-22 20:39               ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-22 21:00                 ` Paul Moore
2014-10-22 21:18                   ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-23 19:15                     ` Paul Moore
2014-10-30 14:55                 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-30 14:48             ` Typo in AUDIT_FEATURE_CHANGE events [was: Re: [RFC][PATCH] audit: log join and part events to the read-only multicast log socket] Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-30 15:10               ` Steve Grubb
2014-10-30 15:23                 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-29 21:38         ` [RFC][PATCH] audit: log join and part events to the read-only multicast log socket Richard Guy Briggs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1919994.kBtqGod6UL@sifl \
    --to=pmoore@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenny@magitekltd.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.