From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A0B60D5A for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2013 08:42:52 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,508,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="452082851" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.56]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2013 08:42:51 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: Koen Kooi , Eric =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=E9nard?= Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:42:50 +0000 Message-ID: <1921702.El3fv2RuWf@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.8.0-34-generic; KDE/4.10.5; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <2D278DF6-68CE-4D88-B356-E70750AE2FCC@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <1387380021-20465-1-git-send-email-eric@eukrea.com> <20131218173603.40ac0c16@e6520eb> <2D278DF6-68CE-4D88-B356-E70750AE2FCC@dominion.thruhere.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [meta-networking][PATCH] inetutils: fix compile error when PATH_PROCNET_DEV is undefined X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:42:52 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Wednesday 18 December 2013 17:37:24 Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 18 dec. 2013, om 17:36 heeft Eric B=E9nard het v= olgende > geschreven: > > Le Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:33:24 +0100, > > Koen Kooi a =E9crit : > >> Eric B=E9nard schreef op 18-12-13 16:20: > >>> patch taken from : > >>> http://repository.timesys.com/buildsources/i/inetutils/inetutils-= 1.9/ine > >>> tutils-1.9-PATH_PROCNET_DEV.patch>>=20 > >> Put that in the patch itself please and also add an Upstream-Statu= s tag. > >=20 > > I don't know which status to put there as it's not upstream : which= > > one is appropriate ? >=20 > I put in "Unknown" in that case, but that's not a valid option for OE= -core > recipes.=20 The valid list, as agreed by the TSC some time ago, is part of the docu= ment we=20 have here: http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines Cheers, Paul --=20 Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre