From: Darron Broad <darron@kewl.org>
To: Georg Acher <acher@in.tum.de>
Cc: Linux-dvb <linux-dvb@linuxtv.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] [RFC] SNR units in tuners
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:43:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19262.1224449033@kewl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081019195409.GW6792@braindead1.acher>
In message <20081019195409.GW6792@braindead1.acher>, Georg Acher wrote:
hi
>On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 06:42:08AM +0100, Darron Broad wrote:
><cx24116>
>> The trouble there is that the scaling for the cx24116 already works
>> from an end-user perspective. The value derived in the code is
>> a possible maximum of 160 from the chip. REELBOX decided on 176
>> which may be more accurate.
>
>The reelbox code was just a heuristic approach to scale the value so that
>less than 30-40% is where the trouble starts... I've more or less matched it
>to femon's colors. There was no intention to indicate dBs, as end users
>don't understand dBs anyway ;-)
All sat receivers I see just scale to fit. We can read lots of forum
posts where people exchange % readings for sats :-)
>The docs for the 24116 say that the snr is measured in 0.1dB steps. The
>absolute range of registers a3:d5 is 0 to 300, so full scale is 30dB. I
>doubt we will see the 30dB in a real-world setup...
Okay, so we know the step size of 0.1 per bit and that's measured
within a range of 0 to 300 but that doesn't actually say what it's
value is? Ie, is 50=5dB or something else?
All the graphs I see for QPSK and 8PSK in use in the real-world
suggest the theoretical limit of esn0 is a lot less than that available
range. I don't know what is the accepted error rate to set this limit.
Perhaps someone who has authority on this subject can chime in?
On the cx24116 testing observed that a register max of 160 from QPSK
gave good approximation to that given by regular sat-kit sitting
around 100%. If that really means 16dB then it doesn't look right
compared to the graphs I see, what's wrong here?
>The signal strength in 9e/9d is the value of the AGC voltage. Register da
>seems to contain the estimated power level (-25 to -70dBm), but there's no
>further information about that (step size etc). I guess the firmware derives
>it from the AGC settings.
Okay. All that's done in cx24116.c is take that val and invert
it, which is enough I suppose.
cya!
--
// /
{:)==={ Darron Broad <darron@kewl.org>
\\ \
_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-19 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-17 18:04 [linux-dvb] [RFC] SNR units in tuners Devin Heitmueller
2008-10-17 18:13 ` Steven Toth
2008-10-17 19:55 ` Darron Broad
2008-10-17 20:06 ` Devin Heitmueller
2008-10-18 5:42 ` Darron Broad
2008-10-19 19:54 ` Georg Acher
2008-10-19 20:43 ` Darron Broad [this message]
2008-10-19 21:52 ` Georg Acher
2008-10-19 23:40 ` Darron Broad
2008-10-20 0:01 ` Darron Broad
2008-10-18 18:56 ` Richard Scobie
2008-10-17 22:01 ` Patrick Boettcher
2008-10-18 18:36 ` Trent Piepho
2008-10-18 19:38 ` Matthias Schwarzott
2008-10-19 11:46 ` Andreas Oberritter
2008-10-25 14:59 ` wk
2008-10-27 10:37 ` Morgan Tørvolt
2008-10-27 14:03 ` Georg Acher
2008-10-27 15:54 ` Andy Walls
2008-10-27 16:16 ` Morgan Tørvolt
2008-10-27 16:25 ` Georg Acher
2008-10-27 16:40 ` Manu Abraham
2009-08-07 7:04 ` VDR User
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19262.1224449033@kewl.org \
--to=darron@kewl.org \
--cc=acher@in.tum.de \
--cc=linux-dvb@linuxtv.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.