From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub Subject: Re: rgw and the next giant release Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:29:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1926683775.2844514.1423582146260.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <54DA1E34.8050301@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx5-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.37]:59583 "EHLO mx5-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750726AbbBJPaK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:30:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54DA1E34.8050301@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Loic Dachary Cc: Ceph Development ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loic Dachary" > To: "Yehuda Sadeh" > Cc: "Ceph Development" > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 7:05:24 AM > Subject: rgw and the next giant release >=20 > Hi Yehuda, >=20 > The rgw teuthology suite for the next giant release as found in > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/giant-backports came back (see > http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-02-02_23:56:11-rgw-giant-backports-= --basic-multi) > with one environmental error > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501#teuthology-run-6b08a729540c61f3c= 8b15c5a3ce9382634bf800c-february-2015. >=20 > Do you think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? Yes. Thanks, Yehuda >=20 > Note that the integration branch now contains all the rgw pull reques= ts > targeting giant as listed here: >=20 > http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph-backports/wikis/giant#included= -and-tested-in-integration-branch >=20 > Which includes cherry picks I did for the following as you suggested: >=20 > - 9918 RGW-Swift: SubUser access permissions, does not seems to wor= kminor > - 10103 swift tests failing > upgrade:dumpling-firefly-x:parallel-next-distro-basic-multi run > - 10471 rgw: metadata sync doesn't create subusers correctly > - 9254 rgw: civetweb requires explicit \r\n for http headers > - 9478 Incorrect content type in response header > - 9479 ETag is not included in the XML response to put object copy > operationminor > - 9877 In some cases it's possible for rgw to segfault on http COPY > - 5595 object has a Content-Type, but its content_type property is > not shown in Swift object enumeration > - 9907 Normal radosgw-admin: can't disable max_size quota > - 9973 Validation of Swift DLO manifest object ETag doesn't match > OpenStack Swift behavior > - 10307 rgw: setting bucket attributes (swift POST on bucket) > sometimes failminor > - 9587 ceph-radosgw sysvinit script on EL6 cannot set ulimit >=20 > Your original list included three more: >=20 > - 9878 rhel7 s3-tests fail due to missing reason > - 10329 rgw: s3 need to return SignatureDoesNotMatch instead of Acce= ssDenied > - 10334 rgw: s3 need to return InvalidAccessKeyId instead of AccessD= enied >=20 > but you wrote that 10329 and 10334 do not need backporting and 9878 w= as > already backported. >=20 > Cheers > -- > Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html