From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, hverkuil@xs4all.nl,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] int3472: Support GPIO con_id based on _HID
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:32:12 +0200 (EET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1938d858-6d66-69f8-5952-9cecf133f254@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64b617e1-bf52-442e-be56-71c76d973edd@redhat.com>
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11-Feb-25 11:06 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 09:28:38AM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >> One patch turned into a set, the second patch being the original one.
> >>
> >> since v6:
> >>
> >> - Reword the comment regarding GPIO map processing.
> >
> > Hans, Ilpo, I think this is in good enough shape
> > (the order of the checks I'm still not happy about
> > we can amend later on if required). Can it be taken?
>
> Yes this looks good to me. Ilpo can you merge these 3 as fixes
> for the 6.14 cycle ?
Currently, these don't appear in lore for some reason (not in
patchwork)...
Sakari, could you please resend the series v7 so that it hopefully gets
picked up by lore and is easier for me to apply them using the normal
tools I've.
The last patch IMO falls outside of even borderline for fixes. I think
I'll put it into for-next after merging the two first ones from fixes
branch into for-next.
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-11 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-11 7:28 [PATCH v7 0/3] int3472: Support GPIO con_id based on _HID Sakari Ailus
2025-02-11 7:28 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] platform/x86: int3472: Use correct type for "polarity", call it gpio_flags Sakari Ailus
2025-02-11 7:28 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] platform/x86: int3472: Call "reset" GPIO "enable" for INT347E Sakari Ailus
2025-02-11 7:28 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] platform/x86: int3472: Call "func" "con_id" instead Sakari Ailus
2025-02-11 10:06 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] int3472: Support GPIO con_id based on _HID Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-11 10:18 ` Hans de Goede
2025-02-11 14:32 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2025-02-11 15:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-11 17:12 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-02-11 17:28 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-02-11 17:45 ` Sakari Ailus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1938d858-6d66-69f8-5952-9cecf133f254@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.