From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Clemens Eisserer Subject: Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 10:23:46 +0200 Message-ID: <194f625505091801231f54980@mail.gmail.com> References: <432AFB44.9060707@namesys.com> <200509171356.14497.vda@ilport.com.ua> <200509171415.50454.vda@ilport.com.ua> <200509180934.50789.chriswhite@gentoo.org> Reply-To: linuxhippy@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <200509180934.50789.chriswhite@gentoo.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com The longer I read discussions about the inclusion of reiser4 into the kernel the more I think the whole discussion has to do with personal oppinions, not with technical problems or limitations that should be adressed. Anybody who is a ext3 fan seems to find his own reasons why reaiser4 should stay away - thats real competition - could be fud-people payed by redhat how seem to force anybody to use ext3 (thanks for fc4 bullshit) ;-) I have heard so many reasons why reiser4 should not be in kernel, however nobody seems to think about why it should be included. Its the only really activly developed linux vs with features most (all) other fs lack and it has a great ability for improvements through plugins. just makes me sad, lg Clemens