From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Clemens Eisserer" Subject: Re: State of the Reiser4 FS Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:32:32 +0100 Message-ID: <194f62550603140732j6ef10757j@mail.gmail.com> References: <3aa654a40603140241s5d8a7430j6bf29a5ef7dd1bf5@mail.gmail.com> <1142336718.7415.55.camel@tribesman.namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <1142336718.7415.55.camel@tribesman.namesys.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com > AFAIK, the most recent reason why reiser4 does not get included is that > reiser4 developers have to change reiser4 to use generic code to > implement read/write. > AFAICS, reiser4 developers do not work on that. Has this really become a reason to not include reiser4 into mainline? I also don't see a reason for that - at least it would bind reiser4 more close to linux making ports to other OS harder. Furthermore if it would decrease performance its simply no way to go. (btw. I think this could be a way to generate some revenue - I think there is demand for a modern fs which is supported by both, windows and linux). lg Clemens