From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51017) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bYDzC-0006BX-5F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:03:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bYDzA-0001o4-AC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:03:01 -0400 Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.24]:51213) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bYDzA-0001Wm-1n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:03:00 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 03:20:56 -0400 (EDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau Message-ID: <1956404709.2011431.1470986456062.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1470842980-32481-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1470842980-32481-4-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20160812063828.GG2759@al.usersys.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/3] vhost-user: Attempt to fix a race with set_mem_table. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Prerna Saxena Cc: Fam Zheng , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell , marcandre lureau Hi ----- Original Message ----- > sent a follow-up response to GET_FEATURES), I am now wondering if this pa= tch > may break existing vhost applications too ? If so, reverting it possibly > better. > What confuses me is why it doesn=E2=80=99t fail all the time, but only ab= out 20% to > 30% time as Fam reports. >=20 > Thoughts : Michael, Fam, MarcAndre ? Indeed, I didn't ack that patch in the first place for that kind of reasons= , so I would revert it. thanks