From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: jdmason@kudzu.us, kexec@lists.infradead.org, horms@verge.net.au,
ebiederm@xmission.com, hpa@zytor.com, dyoung@redhat.com,
WANG Chao <chaowang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass for kdump
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:34:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1972414.2B2S29ZK0k@skinner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140224152205.GC4631@redhat.com>
On Monday, February 24, 2014 10:22:05 AM Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:58:41PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
> [..]
>
> > > Approaches to avoid saved_max_pfn in calgary case:
> > > 1) If done correctly from the beginning, the TCE table size would have
> > >
> > > been exposed via /sys and kexec-tools could simply add:
> > > calgary="128k|512K...|8M" which is already caught by pci-calgary
> > > and
> > > saved_max_pfn is not needed/touched anymore.
> > > -> Disadvantage: needs a new sysfs entry
> > >
> > > 2) When finding max_pfn for calgary table size usage, we could try in
> > >
> > > kdump case to use the highest memory (RAM or RESERVED) showing up
> > > in e820 map.
> >
> > How could this replace saved_max_pfn? The highest memory in kdump can't
> > necessarily be the real ram size. In kdump, RAM range is just part of the
> > real ram, not mentioning we don't pass RESERVED range to kdump E820.
I expected you pass RAM that must not be used as RESERVED. Then, still
depending on which mem type is the last one, it might have worked.
> I vaguely remember there was some discussion about passing first kerne's
> RAM as special reserved ranges. Say E820_RESERVED_KDUMP. And use that
> to figure out saved_max_pfn.
>
> I personally feel that just create a new command line parameter
> "saved_max_pfn" and pass it to second kernel and be done with it. Modify
> calgary code to first look for saved_max_pfn and if not present, calculate
> saved_max_pfn from e820.
>
> saved_max_pfn command line option is pretty ugly, not sure what are the
> better options here.
It should be done like that:
The specified_table_size variable must be exported via sysfs.
If kexec-tools finds it existing it can pass in the table size via
boot param:
calgary=
(compare with calgary_parse_options() in arch/x86/kernel/pci-calgary_64.c).
Then the table size detection (for which saved_max_pfn is needed) would
fall off in kdump case.
If this really is supported/relevant, I can send something, but it
would need kexec-tools code as well.
Thomas
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-24 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-20 9:28 [PATCH v2 0/4] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass for kdump WANG Chao
2014-02-20 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] cleanup: add dbgprint_mem_range function WANG Chao
2014-02-20 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86: Store memory ranges globally used for crash kernel to boot into WANG Chao
2014-02-20 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86: add --pass-memmap-cmdline option WANG Chao
2014-02-20 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] x86: Pass memory range via E820 for kdump WANG Chao
2014-02-27 20:53 ` Linn Crosetto
2014-02-28 8:32 ` WANG Chao
2014-02-24 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass " Thomas Renninger
2014-02-24 14:58 ` WANG Chao
2014-02-24 15:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-24 15:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-02-24 15:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-02-24 15:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-24 15:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-02-24 15:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-24 15:34 ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
2014-02-24 15:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-02-24 15:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-24 15:59 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1972414.2B2S29ZK0k@skinner \
--to=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=chaowang@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.