From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michal Srb Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Add i915.dp_limit_max_lane_count driver option. Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:06:51 +0200 Message-ID: <1975951.qvJkaLOmuO@dhcp17> References: <1870321.D0AfKTtRus@dhcp89> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Tuesday 26 of March 2013 16:49:30 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Michal Srb wrote: > > I have IBM POS machine (4852-570 Truman) that has internal monitor > > connected over display port. It reports to have 2 lanes, but only 1 > > lane works reliably. With 2 lanes used, the monitor sometimes doesn't > > turn on. It seems that this is hardware issue specific for this model. > > > > From discussion that was around the > > 2514bc510d0c3aadcc5204056bb440fa36845147 commit I understand there are > > more machines that have similar problems. This option can be used to > > solve them. > > It sounds like we need to start with a DPCD quirk database ... Ajax? > -Daniel Any update? DPCD of this monitor is 10 0a 82 40 00 00 01 00 02 00 00 00 10 01 00 by the way. Is the i915.dp_limit_max_lane_count unacceptable even as temporary workaround? Michal Srb