From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: oulijun <oulijun@huawei.com>, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: xiaoyun.li@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, linuxarm@openeuler.org,
Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] app/testpmd: support Tx mbuf free on demand cmd
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 10:57:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1980606.NPtmdolmL5@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35583d9b-0782-74a7-95df-aef1ca35f819@intel.com>
09/03/2021 10:53, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 3/9/2021 8:49 AM, oulijun wrote:
> > 2021/3/9 1:33, Ferruh Yigit:
> >> Similar to above comment 'rte_eth_devices' is the internal variable,
> >> applications should not access it directly.
> >>
> > No API is available, and multiple references exist in the testpmd file.
>
> Technically 'rte_eth_devices' is still visible to the applications because of
> the static inline functions, in theory it should be hidden.
>
> But this variable accessed by our test application multiple times may be the
> sign that something more is missing.
>
> Thomas, Andrew, what to you think to try to clean this usage from testpmd and
> add more APIs if needed for this?
I fully agree.
The test applications and examples should help identifying gaps
in the libraries. So we should not workaround the official API.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-09 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-05 7:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support Tx mbuf free on demand cmd Lijun Ou
2021-03-05 7:46 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-03-05 9:58 ` oulijun
2021-03-05 9:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] " Lijun Ou
2021-03-08 17:33 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-09 8:49 ` oulijun
2021-03-09 9:53 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-09 9:57 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-03-09 10:18 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-03-09 14:00 ` Aaron Conole
2021-03-09 14:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-10 1:48 ` oulijun
2021-03-10 7:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-12 10:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [Linuxarm] " oulijun
2021-03-12 11:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-17 11:30 ` oulijun
2021-03-17 12:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-18 3:56 ` oulijun
2021-03-18 7:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-12 13:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3] " Lijun Ou
2021-04-19 3:11 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-19 12:40 ` oulijun
2021-04-19 14:56 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-19 12:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4] " Lijun Ou
2021-04-19 15:28 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 1:44 ` oulijun
2021-04-21 8:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V5] app/test-pmd: support cleanup txq mbufs command Lijun Ou
2021-04-21 8:15 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21 8:32 ` oulijun
2021-04-21 8:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V6] " Lijun Ou
2021-04-21 11:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1980606.NPtmdolmL5@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
--cc=oulijun@huawei.com \
--cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.