Re: [dpdk-maintainers] Example(Load_balancer) Tx Flush Bug(This bug DPDK each version)

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>]

Hi,

Sorry if you feel your patch is ignored.
It is not in the right format for several reasons we tried
to explain earlier I think.
Please read carefully this doc:
	http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/patches.html


2017-01-16 19:16, Maple:
> From: Maple <liujian@raisecom.com>
> To: <qiming.yang@intel.com>;<dev@dpdk.org>
> Cc: <maintainers@dpdk.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] Load_balancer Tx Flush Bug
> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2017 19:15:48 +0800
> Message-Id: <1482371868-19669-1-git-send-email-liujian@raisecom.com>
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1
> In-Reply-To: <2016122122394164225248@raisecom.com>
> References: <2016122122394164225248@raisecom.com>
> 
> We found a bug in use load_balancer example,and,This bug DPDK each version.
> In IO tx flush, only flush port 0.
> So,If I enable more than the Port,then,In addition to 0 port won't flush.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maple <liujian@raisecom.com>
> ---
>  a/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c | 667 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  b/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c | 669 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 1336 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 a/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c
>  create mode 100644 b/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c
> 
> diff --git a/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c b/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c
> index 9612392..3a2e900 100644
> --- a/test/a/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c
> +++ b/test/b/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c
> @@ -418,9 +418,11 @@ app_lcore_io_tx(
>  static inline void
>  app_lcore_io_tx_flush(struct app_lcore_params_io *lp)
>  {
> +       uint8_t i;
>         uint8_t port;
> 
> -       for (port = 0; port < lp->tx.n_nic_ports; port ++) {
> +       port = lp->tx.nic_ports[0];
> +       for (i = 0; i < lp->tx.n_nic_ports; i ++) {
>                 uint32_t n_pkts;
> 
>                 if (likely((lp->tx.mbuf_out_flush[port] == 0) ||
>