From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Michael Neuling To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: self-modifying code in 2.6 kernel for ppc writes into readonly section In-reply-to: <48A9F423.2070602@freescale.com> References: <78ef7ce10808180901v6c694e63xefc37dd97485533@mail.gmail.com> <1586.1219087193@neuling.org> <78ef7ce10808181257u637c5597xaa992b9e4e7a0925@mail.gmail.com> <11009.1219092703@neuling.org> <78ef7ce10808181427m507434f4we84d507b090a707b@mail.gmail.com> <18942.1219097397@neuling.org> <48A9F423.2070602@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:18:48 -0500 Message-ID: <19896.1219097928@neuling.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Mihaela Grigore List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , In message <48A9F423.2070602@freescale.com> you wrote: > Michael Neuling wrote: > >> It seems like no one else is interested in the subject, so i will talk > >> directly to you. > >> > >> If you say that the cpu also seg faults, it means that the problem is > >> in the code of the linux kernel... :) > > > > Sorry, I was only joking. The hardware does _not_ segfault. There is > > no equivalent to segfault in real hardware. > > Well, there are machine checks and checkstops... :-) Shhhh! :-) Mikey