From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [143.182.124.37]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700586065F for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2013 09:46:56 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,764,1367996400"; d="scan'208";a="372525620" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.160]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2013 09:46:55 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Paul Barker Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 17:46:54 +0100 Message-ID: <1989833.hj21tvi2MC@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.8.0-26-generic; KDE/4.10.5; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <51D42561.8060907@ts.fujitsu.com> <51D6BD77.4050008@ts.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: bitbake dies with an python exception | AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rfind' X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:46:56 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Paul, On Sunday 28 July 2013 15:09:46 Paul Barker wrote: > I've just ran into this again building dylan with the latest version > of bitbake as it doesn't appear that the dylan branch of > openembedded-core sets FAKEROOTCMD in bitbake.conf. I've cherry-picked > the commit below from master onto dylan and it looks like the build is > now going ahead happily. > > Bitbake has no dylan branch so I just assumed I was correct using > master. Am I wrong here? Technically the matching bitbake branch for dylan is 1.18. I'm not sure if we spell this out anywhere, we probably should if not. > If bitbake master is supposed to be able to build old branches of > OpenEmbedded, perhaps this commit needs backporting to dylan/danny/etc? It > looks like it shouldn't cause any harm if an older bitbake version is used > as it simply adds values for FAKEROOTBASEENV and FAKEROOTCMD. I haven't checked if it's a genuine problem, but I'd be concerned that any fixes that went into OE-Core for bitbake's worker refactoring are not in dylan and therefore you might get problems other than the one with FAKEROOTCMD. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre