From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Leinen Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 05:07:58 +0000 Subject: [LARTC] Re: List fault? Message-Id: <19906.12462.483462.689885@macsl.switch.ch> List-Id: References: <20110504221215.GJ4369@michelle1> In-Reply-To: <20110504221215.GJ4369@michelle1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org > Hello Grant Taylor, > Am 2011-05-04 14:24:17, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: >> (I'll make this pitch again.) >> >> Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list >> so that it sets the Reply-To header so that replies are directed >> back to the mailing list (as a discussion list)? > For WHAT? Real MTAs have byside and I'm with Michelle on this one. People are capable of choosing between these ("r" and "f" in my case, or "Reply"/"Reply to all" on other MUAs). >> All in favor? >> Any one against? > Yes. Count me in the "against" camp. Best regards, -- Simon. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc