From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pysiak Satriani <pysiak.satriani@wp.pl>
Subject: future r4 maintenance question
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 17:32:44 +0200
Message-ID: <1992401892.20060722173244@wp.pl>
Reply-To: Pysiak Satriani <pysiak.satriani@wp.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-29138-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Hello,

one of the concerns of LKML folks about r4 is that namesys after
finishing their work with r4 will "rush off" to reiser5 leaving
r4 as "stable" in a "bugfix-mode only"

I understand that way of things - you don't mess with a "stable" branch
software.

But a question arises. Will namesys keep r4 in a bugfix-only mode
(as with reiserfs v3) or will it have resources planned not only
for bugfixes but for updates too ?

I think that's a thing that needs to be very clear.

Best regards,
Maciej