From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guido Winkelmann Subject: Re: Unmountable btrfs filesystems Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:54:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1994850.3pprtJuiTQ@pc10> References: <4FDCD484.50706@widodh.nl> <4FDDE1DE.5030709@tuxadero.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from unknownsite.de ([62.48.69.106]:34828 "EHLO hartes-hannover.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755537Ab2FVOyr (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:54:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FDDE1DE.5030709@tuxadero.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: martin@tuxadero.com Cc: Wido den Hollander , ceph-devel Am Sonntag, 17. Juni 2012, 15:55:42 schrieb Martin Mailand: > Hi Wido, > until recently there were still a few bugs in btrfs which could be hit > quite easily with ceph. The last big one was fixed here > http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-devel/msg06270.html I keep hearing things along the lines of "yes, btrfs is really really close to ready, we just had some really nasty bug in the last release, so you absolutely have to run the very latest Linux kernel" since at least Linux 3.1. I think I will probably wait until there have been at least three major Linux releases with no serious btrfs issues before I start using it in production. Guido