All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Licensing of libaudit and libauparse
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:48:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1998000.GV3LKLYfuP@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170320031304.GA4113@clifford>

On Sunday, March 19, 2017 11:13:04 PM EDT Richard Fontana wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 01:54:52PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Saturday, March 18, 2017 11:32:14 PM EDT Richard Fontana wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > The README file in the audit userspace package says:
> > >   LICENSE
> > >   =======
> > >   The audit daemon is released as GPL'd code. The
> > >   audit daemon's libraries libaudit.* and libauparse.* are released
> > >   under LGPL so that it may be linked with 3rd party software.
> > > 
> > > However don't these libraries contain code from this file
> > > https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/blob/master/lib/strsplit.
> > > c
> > > which states its license is GPLv2+?
> > 
> > Yes, that looks like a copy and paste mistake. Thanks for pointing that
> > out. Anything in:
> > 
> > https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/blob/master/lib/
> > https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/blob/master/auparse/
> > https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/blob/master/bindings/
> > 
> > is intended to LGPL. Would replacing the comment at the beginning of the
> > file be sufficient to fix this issue?
> 
> It may depend on the history of the file. If you were the only person
> who contributed to it, yes. But if anyone else contributed to it, and
> let's say the contributions were not copyrighted by Red Hat, and the
> contributions were sufficiently nontrivial, then maybe we'd have to
> get permission from such other contributors to change the indicated
> license of the file.

OK. Good to know. I am the sole contributor to that file. I also checked and 
fixed some new files in auparse/ to which I am also the sole contributor at the 
same time. Everything is good in git and the next release should take care of 
this issue.

Thanks for noticing this.

-Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-20 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-19  3:32 Licensing of libaudit and libauparse Richard Fontana
2017-03-19 17:54 ` Steve Grubb
2017-03-20  3:13   ` Richard Fontana
2017-03-20 15:48     ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2017-03-20 20:14       ` Richard Fontana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1998000.GV3LKLYfuP@x2 \
    --to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rfontana@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.