All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@e-mind.com>,
	Rik van Riel <H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Alan Cox <number6@the-village.bc.nu>
Subject: Re: New patch (was Re: [PATCH] swapin readahead v3 + kswapd fixes)
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 18:59:05 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <199812211859.SAA02961@dax.scot.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.981221095438.6187B-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>

Hi,

On Mon, 21 Dec 1998 09:58:10 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@transmeta.com> said:

> I'm testing it now - the problem is probably just due to my mixing up the
> pre-2 and pre-3 patches, and pre-3 got the "timid" memory freeing
> parameters even though the whole point of the pre-3 approach is that it
> isn't needed any more.

Yep, and although things did improve when I restored some of that
aggressiveness (initial priority = 6 again), it was still mondo slow
on 8MB.  I also restored the swapout loop (so that the foreground
try_to_free_page() takes a swap cluster argument again, rather than
always freeing just one page at a time); still no improvement (which
actually surprised me --- I guess that kswapd is doing clustering for
swapout well enough on its own).

>> You simply CANNOT tell from looking at the code that it "will
>> work well for everybody out there on every hardware".  

> Agreed.

> However, I very much believe that tweaking comes _after_ the basic
> arhictecture is right. 

Right.

> As such, your "current != kswapd" tweak gave a whopping good hint about
> what the architecture _should_ be. And we'll be zeroing in on something
> that has both the performance and the architecture right. 

Sure: I think we can agree that the most important principle in this
respect is that the foreground and background swapping tasks may be
similar but they do not _need_ to be the same, and they may well have
different requirements.

Linus, would it help at all if I just sat down and recoded the VM I'm
running now in a manner which makes the design obvious?  In other
words, clearly separate out the foreground and background paths as you
have done, with the "current != kswapd" test removed and the
foreground-specific code in its own, identifiable code path, but
preserving the actual algorithm?

--Stephen
--
This is a majordomo managed list.  To unsubscribe, send a message with
the body 'unsubscribe linux-mm me@address' to: majordomo@kvack.org

  reply	other threads:[~1998-12-21 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1998-12-01  6:55 [PATCH] swapin readahead v3 + kswapd fixes Rik van Riel
1998-12-01  8:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
1998-12-01 15:28   ` Rik van Riel
1998-12-17  1:24 ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-19 17:09   ` New patch (was Re: [PATCH] swapin readahead v3 + kswapd fixes) Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-12-19 18:41     ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-19 19:41     ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-19 22:01       ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-12-20  3:05         ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-20 14:18         ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-21 13:03           ` Andrea Arcangeli
1998-12-21 13:39           ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-12-21 14:08             ` Andrea Arcangeli
1998-12-21 16:42               ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-12-21  9:53     ` Andrea Arcangeli
1998-12-21 16:37       ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-12-21 17:58         ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-21 18:59           ` Stephen C. Tweedie [this message]
1998-12-21 19:38             ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-22  7:56           ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-12-22 10:49             ` Andrea Arcangeli
1998-12-22 15:32               ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-12-22 15:40                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
1998-12-22 16:26                   ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-22 19:55                     ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-12-22 20:25                     ` Rik van Riel
1998-12-22 21:56                       ` Linus Torvalds
1998-12-22 20:10                   ` Rik van Riel
1998-12-22 22:35                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
1998-12-23  8:45                       ` Rik van Riel
1998-12-22 20:03                 ` Rik van Riel
1998-12-22 17:23               ` [patch] swap_out now really free (the right) pages [Re: New patch (was Re: [PATCH] swapin readahead v3 + kswapd fixes)] Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=199812211859.SAA02961@dax.scot.redhat.com \
    --to=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl \
    --cc=andrea@e-mind.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=number6@the-village.bc.nu \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.