From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA31595 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 14:08:54 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA52169 for linux-list; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 14:06:29 -0800 (PST) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from fir.engr.sgi.com (fir.engr.sgi.com [150.166.61.141]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id OAA57074 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 14:06:27 -0800 (PST) mail_from (wje@fir.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from wje@localhost) by fir.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA20918; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 14:06:20 -0800 Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 14:06:20 -0800 Message-Id: <199901152206.OAA20918@fir.engr.sgi.com> From: "William J. Earl" To: Alex deVries Cc: SGI Linux Subject: Re: linus.linux.sgi.com In-Reply-To: References: Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Alex deVries writes: > > I don't mean to seem like a bother, but what is the deal with > linus.linux.sgi.com? We really need that machine for development. I think > it's been a week now. I apologize for SGI for the long delay. I just clarified to the support people that it is indeed a critical resource, and they say it should be back within two hours. Some failed hardware (not, apparently, on that machine itself) is being replaced. For the longer term, I will work on assuring more stable service.