From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA10418 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 15:33:11 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA83599 for linux-list; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 15:32:29 -0800 (PST) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA73671 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 15:32:25 -0800 (PST) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA00148 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 15:32:24 -0800 (PST) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-26.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.26]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA18485 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:32:21 +0100 (MET) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA20228; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:29:03 +0100 Message-ID: <19990215002746.C644@uni-koblenz.de> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:27:46 +0100 From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Memory corruption on Indy Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Hi all, since quite some time I've tried to find a memory corruption bug on my Indy. I now suspect that the actual cause is a hardware problem and a recent IRIX kernel core dump supports that theory. Just to be on the safe side, could people running Linux on Indys please run something like find / -fstype ext2 -type f | xargs md5sym several times and compare the obtained output. Do they differ in any unexplainable way? Thanks, Ralf