From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA65636 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:33:12 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA75874 for linux-list; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:32:15 -0800 (PST) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA81349 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:32:13 -0800 (PST) mail_from (sgi.com!rachael.franken.de!hub-fue!alpha.franken.de!tsbogend) Received: from rachael.franken.de (rachael.franken.de [193.175.24.38]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA04802 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:32:14 -0800 (PST) mail_from (rachael.franken.de!hub-fue!alpha.franken.de!tsbogend) Received: from hub-fue by rachael.franken.de via rmail with uucp id for cthulhu.engr.sgi.com!linux; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:30:54 +0100 (MET) (Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #4 built DST-Sep-8) Received: by hub-fue.franken.de (Smail3.1.29.1 #35) id m10KsRA-002OzyC; Thu, 11 Mar 99 00:30 MET Received: (from tsbogend@localhost) by alpha.franken.de (8.8.7/8.8.5) id AAA00371; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:27:13 +0100 Message-ID: <19990311002713.A368@alpha.franken.de> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:27:13 +0100 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: eedthwo@eede.ericsson.se Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Illegal f_magic number while install-procedure References: <199903081247.NAA02741@sun168.eu> <19990309000234.A2804@alpha.franken.de> <199903100920.KAA01213@sun168.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2 In-Reply-To: <199903100920.KAA01213@sun168.eu>; from Tom Woelfel on Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 10:20:19AM +0100 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 10:20:19AM +0100, Tom Woelfel wrote: > Then nothing happens anymore. I think the next thing to come should be > the 'init' process (init doesn't need to be an ECOFF - exec ?). no elf is perfect. Could you please send a hinv output ? I suspect this another SC processor. Thomas. -- This device has completely bogus header. Compaq scores again :-| It's a host bridge, but it should be called ghost bridge instead ;^) [Martin `MJ' Mares on linux-kernel]