From: "Verloove, Olivier" <olivier_verloove@merck.com>
To: linux-lvm@msede.com
Subject: RE: [linux-lvm] Bonehead problem
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 10:38:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199903111628.RAA09179@e35.msede.com> (raw)
In fact, I didn't have LVM 0.5 compiled on this system.
The problem was due to the device file /dev/lvm missing.
And thanks for the md[4-15] remark. I'm on RH5.2 and it was the cause of
vgscan hanging the system (see other message).
Olivier
> ----------
> From:
> Steve_J_Brueggeman@notes.seagate.com[SMTP:Steve_J_Brueggeman@notes.seagate
> .com]
> Sent: Thursday, 11 Mar, 1999 16:08
> To: linux-lvm@msede.com
> Subject: RE: [linux-lvm] Bonehead problem
>
>
> It sounds to me like you've got old modules hanging around as left-overs.
> Did you build LVM 0.5 with the same kernel version? (2.2.2 presumably).
> If
> so, did you clear out your old modules directory before you rebuilt the
> kernel with LVM 0.6? Are you using modversions when you build the
> kernel/modules?
>
> I've also noticed that vgscan will cause the kernel will complain about
> not
> being able to find some block devices that I have not compiled into
> modules, or the kernel. This doesn't sound like your problem though.
>
> I've also had a problem when vgscan ran, because of a bug in the md
> driver.
> I run RedHat 5.2, and the default installation created /dev/md0 through
> /dev/md15, but the default md driver is compiled to handle only 4 md
> devices (#define MAX_MD_DEV 4), and because of a bug in the md_open()
> (uses [minor] without checking minor is less than MAX_MD_DEV), my kernel
> would crash when vgscan tried to check /dev/md6 or so. I just rm'd
> /dev/md[4-9] /dev/md1[0-5] to not cause the problem. I don't think this
> is your problem either, but thought you might like to know.
>
> Steve Brueggeman
> (All opinions are my own, and in no way reflect those of my employer).
> (<--legal-crud)
>
>
>
>
>
>
next reply other threads:[~1999-03-11 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-03-11 15:38 Verloove, Olivier [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-03-11 15:27 [linux-lvm] Bonehead problem Verloove, Olivier
1999-03-11 15:09 Steve_J_Brueggeman
1999-03-11 15:08 Steve_J_Brueggeman
1999-03-11 13:40 Verloove, Olivier
1999-03-11 14:56 ` Klaus Strebel
1999-03-10 23:44 Shawn Leas
1999-03-11 0:25 ` ishamael
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199903111628.RAA09179@e35.msede.com \
--to=olivier_verloove@merck.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@msede.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.