From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <bh40@calva.net>
To: Jim Somerville <somer@nortelnetworks.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: quik vs. bootx
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 21:28:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19990413212835.023110@mail.mipsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03E3E0690542D211A1490000F80836F4877DEC@zcard00f.ca.nortel.com>
On Tue, Apr 13, 1999, Jim Somerville <somer@nortelnetworks.com> wrote:
>None of my systems have MacOS on them...I'm using quik. I have no desire
>to reinstall MacOS just so I can boot linux. Will quik work with the 2.2
>kernel, or will I be screwed here? I'm currently using 2.1.24 on all my
>systems.
This should be added to the FAQ...
BootX is not meant to _replace_ quik. Since OF is not working well enough
on a lot of Macs, BootX may be your only choice, but if quik works for
you and you like it, then use it, it's hopefully still working. OF
booting is better from a "theorical" point of view ;-)
--
E-Mail: <mailto:bh40@calva.net>
BenH. Web : <http://calvaweb.calvacom.fr/bh40/>
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-04-13 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-04-13 14:23 quik vs. bootx Jim Somerville
1999-04-13 19:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
1999-04-13 20:57 ` Dave Weis
1999-04-14 10:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
1999-04-14 12:46 ` Dave Weis
1999-04-13 21:26 ` Tom Rini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-04-13 20:25 AArthur
1999-04-09 6:43 Zach Metzinger
1999-04-09 8:57 ` Thomas Capricelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19990413212835.023110@mail.mipsys.com \
--to=bh40@calva.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=somer@nortelnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.