From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailserv2.iuinc.com (qmailr@mailserv2.iuinc.com [206.245.164.55])
	by puffin.external.hp.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA23719
	for <parisc-linux@puffin.external.hp.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 21:05:28 -0600
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 05:05:43 +0200
From: Philipp Rumpf <prumpf@suse.de>
To: Mike Hibler <mike@fast.cs.utah.edu>
Cc: pschwan@thepuffingroup.com, parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] licencing-question... ?
Message-ID: <19990710050543.F29058@suse.de>
References: <199907091810.MAA24058@fast.cs.utah.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <199907091810.MAA24058@fast.cs.utah.edu>; from Mike Hibler on Fri, Jul 09, 1999 at 12:10:55PM -0600
List-ID: <linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org>

> We (Utah CSS/CSL) tried to make our copyrights more "GPL-friendly" in
> later years (i.e., no advertising clause).  If there is still some problem,
> by all means let me know before you go off and rewrite Utah code!  We can
> probably re-release it with a different copyright (he says naively...)

If that indeed would be possible, a simple note stating that it is allowed to
distribute combinations of GPLed code and the code in question under the terms
of the GPL would suffice. What about the Open Software Foundation ?