From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailserv2.iuinc.com (qmailr@mailserv2.iuinc.com [206.245.164.55]) by puffin.external.hp.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA06008 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 08:25:05 -0600 Received: from Galois.suse.de (Galois.suse.de [194.112.123.130]) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F23232CE8 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 1999 16:26:56 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Wotan.suse.de (Wotan.suse.de [10.10.0.1]) by Galois.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252AE67AF for ; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 16:26:56 +0200 (MEST) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 16:26:56 +0200 From: Philipp Rumpf To: parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com Subject: Re: [parisc-linux-cvs] grundler Message-ID: <19990902162656.H10698@suse.de> References: <199909012302.RAA04035@puffin.external.hp.com> <19990902104007.H629@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <19990902104007.H629@suse.de>; from Philipp Rumpf on Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 10:40:07AM +0200 List-ID: > I don't want to sound aggressive, but I really do not see the point in most > of your changes. I really didn't. Honest. Even if the rest of the mails seems to have suggested so to about everyone who read them. > the type of irqs is defined to be int (not unsigned int) in ABIs we cannot APIs. Sorry. Second time today I mix them up. (Actually, this one was the first time).