From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
"Peter Griffin" <peter.griffin@linaro.org>,
"André Draszik" <andre.draszik@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: samsung: exynos-pmu: Fix for CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 19:09:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19a6f296-eb40-49cf-9571-2d7964cd3313@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250905162446.88987-1-smostafa@google.com>
On 05/09/2025 18:24, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> Booting the kernel on Pixel-6 with `CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT` prints the
> following WARN:
>
> [ 0.784187][ T1] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1
> [ 0.784328][ T1] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x20/0x30
> [ 0.784433][ T1] CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.17.0-rc4-gd69eb204c255 #1 PREEMPT
> [ 0.784439][ T1] Hardware name: Oriole (DT)
> [ 0.784441][ T1] Call trace:
> [ 0.784443][ T1] show_stack+0x34/0xa0 (C)
> [ 0.784453][ T1] dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xb0
> [ 0.784460][ T1] dump_stack+0x18/0x24
> [ 0.784464][ T1] check_preemption_disabled+0xf8/0x100
> [ 0.784470][ T1] debug_smp_processor_id+0x20/0x30
> [ 0.784476][ T1] gs101_cpuhp_pmu_online+0x40/0x108
> [ 0.784483][ T1] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x188/0x2d8
> [ 0.784490][ T1] cpuhp_issue_call+0xec/0x240
> [ 0.784494][ T1] __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x140/0x2c0
> [ 0.784499][ T1] __cpuhp_setup_state+0x58/0x88
> [ 0.784504][ T1] exynos_pmu_probe+0x2a4/0x380
> [ 0.784508][ T1] platform_probe+0x64/0xd0
> [ 0.784516][ T1] really_probe+0xd0/0x3b0
> [ 0.784520][ T1] __driver_probe_device+0x8c/0x170
> [ 0.784524][ T1] driver_probe_device+0x44/0x140
> [ 0.784528][ T1] __device_attach_driver+0xd8/0x180
> [ 0.784532][ T1] bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xf8
> [ 0.784536][ T1] __device_attach+0xa8/0x1d0
> [ 0.784540][ T1] device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x30
> [ 0.784544][ T1] bus_probe_device+0xb4/0xc0
> [ 0.784547][ T1] device_add+0x4d0/0x700
> [ 0.784550][ T1] of_device_add+0x4c/0x78
> [ 0.784556][ T1] of_platform_device_create_pdata+0x9c/0x148
> [ 0.784560][ T1] of_platform_bus_create+0x1d0/0x370
> [ 0.784563][ T1] of_platform_bus_create+0x234/0x370
> [ 0.784567][ T1] of_platform_populate+0x84/0x178
> [ 0.784571][ T1] of_platform_default_populate_init+0xf0/0x120
> [ 0.784579][ T1] do_one_initcall+0x68/0x2d0
> [ 0.784585][ T1] kernel_init_freeable+0x2d8/0x358
> [ 0.784589][ T1] kernel_init+0x28/0x168
> [ 0.784595][ T1] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Please trim from unnecessary parts - [time].
>
> As this value is only read once, it doesn't require to be stable, so
Why it does not need to be stable? Onlining wrong CPU number is not
desired...
> just use "raw_smp_processor_id" instead.
You might be just hiding some other real issue, because above stacktrace
is from gs101_cpuhp_pmu_online() which IRQs disabled and preemption
disabled. Provide analysis of the warning, instead of just making it
disappear.
>
> Cc: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>
> Cc: André Draszik <andre.draszik@linaro.org>
>
No blank lines between tags.
Missing Fixes tag... and then Cc is not necessary. Please follow
standard kernel process.
> Signed-off-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c
> index a77288f49d24..338f4758a089 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c
> @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(exynos_get_pmu_regmap_by_phandle);
>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-06 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-05 16:24 [PATCH] soc: samsung: exynos-pmu: Fix for CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-05 17:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-09-05 17:43 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-06 7:07 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-09 10:15 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-09 15:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-09 15:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-09 17:03 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-09 17:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-09 11:14 ` Peter Griffin
2025-09-09 19:03 ` Mostafa Saleh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19a6f296-eb40-49cf-9571-2d7964cd3313@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=andre.draszik@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.