diff for duplicates of <19ef495f-385d-6d46-ac85-1266ced1c2d9@gmail.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 79ccc09..981070a 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ On 9/22/16 2:24 AM, Marcelo wrote: >>>> I can't find any other way to reduce the stack usage except use "static" before >>>> unsigned long buff[TCP_MIB_MAX] >>>> ->>>> PS. sizeof buff is about TCP_MIB_MAX(116)*8’8 +>>>> PS. sizeof buff is about TCP_MIB_MAX(116)*8=928 >>>> B.R. >>> That's pretty much the question. Linux has the option on some archs to >>> run with 4Kb (4KSTACKS option), so this function alone would be using @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ Thanks for the suggestion, I will remove it in future patch version > Numbers were steady across multiple runs. > > Marcelo -Yes, I guess your X86 machine doesn't have the large cpu number as mine (cpu#\x160). +Yes, I guess your X86 machine doesn't have the large cpu number as mine (cpu#=160). The cache misses rate difference btw before and after this patch will be more significant if the cpu number is large. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 188b2d8..f1c1eeb 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "ref\020160921182438.GG9323@localhost.localdomain\0" "From\0hejianet <hejianet@gmail.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/7] proc: Reduce cache miss in {snmp,netstat}_seq_show\0" - "Date\0Thu, 22 Sep 2016 05:38:52 +0000\0" + "Date\0Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:38:52 +0800\0" "To\0Marcelo <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>\0" "Cc\0netdev@vger.kernel.org" linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ ">>>> I can't find any other way to reduce the stack usage except use \"static\" before\n" ">>>> unsigned long buff[TCP_MIB_MAX]\n" ">>>>\n" - ">>>> PS. sizeof buff is about TCP_MIB_MAX(116)*8\342\200\2318\n" + ">>>> PS. sizeof buff is about TCP_MIB_MAX(116)*8=928\n" ">>>> B.R.\n" ">>> That's pretty much the question. Linux has the option on some archs to\n" ">>> run with 4Kb (4KSTACKS option), so this function alone would be using\n" @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ "> Numbers were steady across multiple runs.\n" ">\n" "> Marcelo\n" - "Yes, I guess your X86 machine doesn't have the large cpu number as mine (cpu#\0260).\n" + "Yes, I guess your X86 machine doesn't have the large cpu number as mine (cpu#=160).\n" "The cache misses rate difference btw before and after this patch will be more\n" "significant if the cpu number is large.\n" "\n" @@ -188,4 +188,4 @@ ">> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html\n" >> -7120c86f5d3bc739c6af9bb4ae4dd4d97c30eb74f0476c14f3642f88de587f4a +9338f15c0e263c7188bee2160fe1a4a66cde06c1f0b0e4a78576e0c05b9b1986
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.