From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Vegard Nossum" Subject: Re: [Bug #10955] v2.6.26-rc7: BUG task_struct: Poison overwritten Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:37:00 +0200 Message-ID: <19f34abd0807131237s1494b532s577da1a208b71c2d@mail.gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=/XF9D2hyx5AaN4dXuoOAvJoub3nP69I62KXRJVwDf8I=; b=R3iCr2eClbC7z9pCNQF+L7dM7yovuUFv8Vi4D4wZgD/V85fpl9YC1DQ5vpcDoqGOmN oablRt6haDZ4p3bflcF7oJUO939RRq1Gk0t1OpoXkfLITP+5sVQBXjIe4RX98WxLnLeg kO5aWsOkcXf34znGAD50/JFoz5r3d9C93BPMo= In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Peter Zijlstra On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10955 > Subject : v2.6.26-rc7: BUG task_struct: Poison overwritten > Submitter : Vegard Nossum > Date : 2008-06-21 19:24 (23 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121407641925121&w=4 > Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra Oh, wait, this probably wasn't a regression in the first place. It's probably just obscure and rare enough that it was never discovered earlier. I'm in favour of closing this and reopening if it reappears. Or if you simply just want to take it out of the regression list, that's also fine with me. Vegard -- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756158AbYGMThQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:37:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753952AbYGMThD (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:37:03 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.174]:43878 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753542AbYGMThA (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:37:00 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=MuyTqC5rc8Uj+vW8j6bQyHrqMz0AzCZ/61ylOZ4bcNtIikYoNBS2vYb5S+j0gSKrJx w5/zk0pHXcvV4p89t9reyKwr6Qan5kPswevzTvsa2r0QQ9R/RDRi44VmT0YcIZy5JhsU E9/r0lAeh8vmTdHkbNvPHD9zx0HayO0d6Sbbk= Message-ID: <19f34abd0807131237s1494b532s577da1a208b71c2d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:37:00 +0200 From: "Vegard Nossum" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [Bug #10955] v2.6.26-rc7: BUG task_struct: Poison overwritten Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Kernel Testers List" , "Peter Zijlstra" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10955 > Subject : v2.6.26-rc7: BUG task_struct: Poison overwritten > Submitter : Vegard Nossum > Date : 2008-06-21 19:24 (23 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121407641925121&w=4 > Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra Oh, wait, this probably wasn't a regression in the first place. It's probably just obscure and rare enough that it was never discovered earlier. I'm in favour of closing this and reopening if it reappears. Or if you simply just want to take it out of the regression list, that's also fine with me. Vegard -- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036