From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Kandpal, Suraj" <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/i915/edp: eDP Data Overrride
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 15:20:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19f362457d6313dba0c9eb9fa9daaaceab5df9c6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM3PPF208195D8D72E6302229F3EA47BA27E330A@DM3PPF208195D8D.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025, "Kandpal, Suraj" <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 19 Aug 2025, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
>> > We need override certain link rates in favour of the next available
>> > higher link rate. The Link rates that need to be overridden are
>> > indicated by a mask in VBT. To make sure these modes are skipped we
>> > don't add them in them in the sink rates array.
>> >
>> > --v2
>> > -Update the link rates after we have a final set of link rates [Ankit]
>> > -Break this patch up [Ankit] -Optimize the assingment during loop
>> > [Ankit]
>> >
>> > --v3
>> > -Add protection against broken VBTs [Jani]
>> >
>> > --v4
>> > -Fix build errors
>> > -Create a seprate function to check if edp data override is selected
>> > and using the correct vbt
>> >
>> > --v5
>> > -Use correct number to check the num of edp rates [Ankit]
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h | 2 ++
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> > index 444ed54f7c35..05a74c3bc9af 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> > @@ -2521,11 +2521,24 @@ int intel_bios_dp_max_lane_count(const struct
>> > intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata) bool
>> > intel_bios_encoder_reject_edp_rate(const struct intel_bios_encoder_data
>> *devdata,
>> > int rate)
>> > +{
>> > + return devdata->child.edp_data_rate_override &
>> > +edp_rate_override_mask(rate); }
>> > +
>> > +bool
>> > +intel_bios_vbt_supports_edp_data_override(const struct
>> > +intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata)
>>
>> Why are you adding this function? Earlier versions didn't have it, and the reason
>> for its existence isn't explained or clear.
>>
>
> This function was added in v3 (I did add a small mention in the commit message I can maybe elaborate more there)
> in response to one of your comments in which you mentioned the
> Possibility of ending up with a broken vbt that masked all the link rates causing us to have no link rate
> To drive the edp with this function now checks if we have at least one edp link rate using which we can
> Drive edp if not we do not modify the list of sink rates at all.
You can check for that scenario in intel_bios_encoder_reject_edp_rate(),
and return false for all rates if all of the bits are set.
We don't have to leak these checks into callers.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Regards,
> Suraj Kandpal
>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>>
>> > {
>> > if (!devdata || devdata->display->vbt.version < 263)
>> > return false;
>> >
>> > - return devdata->child.edp_data_rate_override &
>> edp_rate_override_mask(rate);
>> > + /*
>> > + * This means the VBT ends up asking us to override every possible rate
>> > + * indicating the VBT is broken so skip this
>> > + */
>> > + if (hweight32(devdata->child.edp_data_rate_override) >=
>> BDB_263_VBT_EDP_NUM_RATES)
>> > + return false;
>> > +
>> > + return true;
>> > }
>> >
>> > static void sanitize_device_type(struct intel_bios_encoder_data
>> > *devdata, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
>> > index 781e08f7eeb2..d24660bcc7f3 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
>> > @@ -276,5 +276,7 @@ void intel_bios_for_each_encoder(struct intel_display
>> *display,
>> > const struct
>> intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata));
>> >
>> > void intel_bios_debugfs_register(struct intel_display *display);
>> > +bool
>> > +intel_bios_vbt_supports_edp_data_override(const struct
>> > +intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata);
>> >
>> > #endif /* _INTEL_BIOS_H_ */
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> > index 54d88f24b689..f6fad42182ae 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> > @@ -4277,6 +4277,26 @@ static void intel_edp_mso_init(struct intel_dp
>> *intel_dp)
>> > intel_dp->mso_pixel_overlap = mso ? info->mso_pixel_overlap : 0; }
>> >
>> > +static void
>> > +intel_edp_set_data_override_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) {
>> > + struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base;
>> > + int *sink_rates = intel_dp->sink_rates;
>> > + int i, j = 0;
>> > +
>> > + if (!intel_bios_vbt_supports_edp_data_override(encoder->devdata))
>> > + return;
>> > +
>> > + for (i = 0; i < intel_dp->num_sink_rates; i++) {
>> > + if (intel_bios_encoder_reject_edp_rate(encoder->devdata,
>> > + intel_dp->sink_rates[i]))
>> > + continue;
>> > +
>> > + sink_rates[j++] = intel_dp->sink_rates[i];
>> > + }
>> > + intel_dp->num_sink_rates = j;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > static void
>> > intel_edp_set_sink_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) { @@ -4327,6
>> > +4347,8 @@ intel_edp_set_sink_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> > intel_dp->use_rate_select = true;
>> > else
>> > intel_dp_set_sink_rates(intel_dp);
>> > +
>> > + intel_edp_set_data_override_rates(intel_dp);
>> > }
>> >
>> > static bool
>>
>> --
>> Jani Nikula, Intel
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-19 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-19 8:05 [PATCH v5 0/3] eDP Data Override Suraj Kandpal
2025-08-19 8:06 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/i915/vbt: Add eDP Data rate overrride field in VBT Suraj Kandpal
2025-08-19 9:16 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-08-19 8:06 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/i915/bios: Add function to check if edp data override is needed Suraj Kandpal
2025-08-19 8:06 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/i915/edp: eDP Data Overrride Suraj Kandpal
2025-08-19 9:30 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-08-19 9:41 ` Jani Nikula
2025-08-19 12:03 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-08-19 12:20 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-08-20 8:07 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-08-19 11:13 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for eDP Data Override (rev6) Patchwork
2025-08-19 11:31 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-08-19 12:59 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-08-19 14:57 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-08-20 6:33 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19f362457d6313dba0c9eb9fa9daaaceab5df9c6@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.