From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Xiaozhen Ban <benhaz1024@gmail.com>,
"Guo, Jia" <jia.guo@intel.com>,
"Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com>,
Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/e1000: fix filter control return value
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:54:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ab204a8870645a986b49abb55814bcb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09dce07d-04a4-cfb8-ab1f-5887a5a5d0d2@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 4:09 PM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Xiaozhen Ban
> <benhaz1024@gmail.com>; Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Wang, Haiyue
> <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: fix filter control
> return value
>
> On 3/25/2021 8:46 AM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Xiaozhen Ban
> >> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 12:08 PM
> >> To: Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Wang, Haiyue
> >> <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: fix filter control return
> >> value
> >>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Xiaozhen Ban <benhaz1024 at gmail.com>
> >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 19:44
> >>>> To: Guo, Jia <jia.guo at intel.com>; Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang at
> >>>> intel.com>
> >>>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stable at dpdk.org
> >>>> Subject: RE: RE: [PATCH] net/e1000: fix filter control return value
> >>>>
> >>>> OK, but I think this bug affects all stable release about 6 years before
> today.
> >>
> >>> I don't think so, since it is PMD internal ops, the real API
> 'rte_flow_ops_get'
> >>> always use RTE_ETH_FILTER_GENERIC. ;-)
> >>
> >> eth_igb_filter_ctrl() called by rte_eth_dev_filter_ctrl(), if
> >> application developer know how to use the parameter filter_type correctly,
> it's OK.
> >> otherwise he will get rte_eth_dev_filter_ctrl() return value is
> >> success but actually is failed.
> >
> > After check with Haiyue, we think the patch is still needed for LTS <=
> > 19.11, so
> >
> > Acked-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> >
> > Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.
> >
>
> What is the status of this patch?
> It seems it did not applied, and the status in the patchwork is "Superseded".
The patch is dropped during rebase, as the function eth_igb_filter_ctrl is removed at below code refectory
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210321090002.595744-2-thomas@monjalon.net/
this is a mistake as we still need this to be captured in LTS
unfortunately, its too late to capture it as the refectory code is already applied to main tree.
@Luca Boccassi
Could you capture this patch as an LTS only one?
Thanks
Qi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-20 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-08 8:10 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: fix incorrect return value if filter type not supported banxiaozhen, benhaz1024
2020-12-08 9:04 ` Wang, Haiyue
2020-12-08 9:58 ` haz ben
2020-12-08 10:40 ` Wang, Haiyue
2020-12-08 11:05 ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-03-17 9:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: fix filter control return value Xiaozhen Ban
2021-03-17 11:23 ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-03-18 11:44 ` Xiaozhen Ban
2021-03-18 15:28 ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-03-19 4:08 ` Xiaozhen Ban
2021-03-25 8:46 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-04-20 8:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-20 9:54 ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]
2021-04-20 14:33 ` Luca Boccassi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ab204a8870645a986b49abb55814bcb@intel.com \
--to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=benhaz1024@gmail.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
--cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.