From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
patches@lists.linux.dev,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] of: Add a KUnit test for overlays and test managed APIs
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:12:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ae778ee8d91819ffdebf613e435d040.sboyd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230406145916.GB3036886-robh@kernel.org>
Quoting Rob Herring (2023-04-06 07:59:16)
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 03:21:53PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay_test.c b/drivers/of/overlay_test.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..66b1dceea568
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/of/overlay_test.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
[...]
> > +/*
> > + * Test that of_overlay_apply_kunit() creates platform devices with the
> > + * expected device_node
> > + */
> > +static void of_overlay_apply_kunit_platform_device(struct kunit *test)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + struct device_node *np;
> > +
> > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0,
> > + of_overlay_apply_kunit(test, kunit_overlay_test));
> > +
> > + np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, kunit_node_name);
> > + of_node_put_kunit(test, np);
> > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> > +
> > + dev = bus_find_device(&platform_bus_type, NULL, np, bus_match_np);
>
> of_find_device_by_node()
Done.
>
> > + put_device(dev); /* Not derefing 'device' after this */
> > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, dev);
> > +
> > + /* Remove overlay */
> > + kunit_cleanup(test);
>
> I guess this is testing the cleanup. It's not that obvious given the
> overlay is removed by kunit_cleanup(). Not sure if anything can be done
> though...
Don't think so? The test name is "of_overlay_apply_kunit_cleanup", so we
need to use the kunit_cleanup() API to simulate that the "test is done".
Otherwise we're testing some other API like of_overlay_remove(), which
could be added as another test case. I specifically wanted to test that
the kunit cleanup path does what we're expecting here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-10 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-27 22:21 [PATCH v3 00/11] clk: Add kunit tests for fixed rate and parent data Stephen Boyd
2023-03-27 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] of: Add KUnit test to confirm DTB is loaded Stephen Boyd
2023-03-27 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] of: Add test managed wrappers for of_overlay_apply()/of_node_put() Stephen Boyd
2023-04-06 14:35 ` Rob Herring
2023-04-10 19:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2023-03-27 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add "test" vendor for KUnit and friends Stephen Boyd
2023-04-06 15:02 ` Rob Herring
2023-03-27 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] dt-bindings: test: Add KUnit empty node binding Stephen Boyd
2023-04-06 15:02 ` Rob Herring
2023-03-27 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] of: Add a KUnit test for overlays and test managed APIs Stephen Boyd
2023-04-06 14:59 ` Rob Herring
2023-04-10 20:12 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2023-04-13 0:04 ` Daniel Latypov
2023-04-13 0:26 ` Stephen Boyd
2023-03-27 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] platform: Add test managed platform_device/driver APIs Stephen Boyd
2023-03-27 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] dt-bindings: kunit: Add fixed rate clk consumer test Stephen Boyd
2023-04-06 15:02 ` Rob Herring
2023-03-27 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] clk: Add test managed clk provider/consumer APIs Stephen Boyd
2023-03-27 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] clk: Add KUnit tests for clk fixed rate basic type Stephen Boyd
2023-03-27 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] dt-bindings: clk: Add KUnit clk_parent_data test Stephen Boyd
2023-04-06 15:03 ` Rob Herring
2023-03-27 22:21 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] clk: Add KUnit tests for clks registered with struct clk_parent_data Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ae778ee8d91819ffdebf613e435d040.sboyd@kernel.org \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.